implementato sorting lavorazioni ma non corretto, serve un algoritmo di STABLE SORTING

This commit is contained in:
luca.mazzoleni
2024-12-23 09:08:03 +01:00
parent 99e0bd27d9
commit 3bce7b5fd6
6 changed files with 91 additions and 9 deletions
+6
View File
@@ -146,11 +146,13 @@ function BeamExec.GetToolsFromDB()
Tool.dStep = EgtGetValInNotes( Tool.sUserNotes, 'STEP', 'd') or ( Tool.dMaxMaterial / 3) -- se non settato nell'utensile, considero metà del tagliente
Tool.dSideStep = EgtGetValInNotes( Tool.sUserNotes, 'SIDESTEP', 'd') or floor( Tool.dDiameter / 3) -- se non settato nell'utensile, considero metà del diametro
Tool.bIsPen = abs( Tool.dSpeed) < 5
Tool.dPerformanceIndex = ( Tool.dDiameter * Tool.dMaxMaterial) / Tool.dLength
-- recupero parametri propri delle lame
elseif sToolFamily == 'SAWBLADE' then
Tool.bIsUsedForLongCut = EgtGetValInNotes( Tool.sUserNotes, 'LONGCUT') == 1 or false -- false come valore di default
Tool.dStep = EgtGetValInNotes( Tool.sUserNotes, 'STEP', 'd') or Tool.dThickness -- se non settato nell'utensile, considero lo spessore lama
Tool.dSideStep = EgtGetValInNotes( Tool.sUserNotes, 'SIDESTEP', 'd') or Tool.dMaxMaterial -- se non settato nell'utensile, considero un quarto del diametro
Tool.dPerformanceIndex = 1 / ( Tool.dDiameter * Tool.dLength)
-- recupero parametri propri delle motoseghe
elseif sToolFamily == 'MORTISE' then
Tool.dDistance = EgtTdbGetCurrToolParam( MCH_TP.DIST) or 90 -- 90mm dimensione standard aggregato catena
@@ -160,7 +162,11 @@ function BeamExec.GetToolsFromDB()
Tool.dSideStep = EgtGetValInNotes( Tool.sUserNotes, 'SIDESTEP', 'd') or ( Tool.dThickness - 1) -- se non settato nell'utensile, considero spessore catena meno 1mm di sicurezza
Tool.dCornerRadius = EgtTdbGetCurrToolParam( MCH_TP.CORNRAD)
Tool.dWidth = Tool.dDiameter
Tool.dPerformanceIndex = 1 / Tool.dLength
end
-- drillbit
else
Tool.dPerformanceIndex = Tool.dDiameter / Tool.dLength
end
-- se tutti i dati necessari sono disponibili, inserisco utensile nella lista globale degli utensili disponibili
+78 -7
View File
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ function MachiningLib.FindMill( Proc, ToolSearchParameters)
-- se hanno stesso montaggio
elseif TOOLS[i].SetupInfo.bToolOnAggregate == TOOLS[nBestToolIndex].SetupInfo.bToolOnAggregate then
-- scelgo utensile con indice di bontà utensile calcolato come: lunghezza / massimo materiale / diametro
if ( TOOLS[i].dLength / TOOLS[i].dMaxMaterial) / TOOLS[i].dDiameter < ( TOOLS[nBestToolIndex].dLength / TOOLS[nBestToolIndex].dMaxMaterial) / TOOLS[nBestToolIndex].dDiameter then
if TOOLS[i].dPerformanceIndex > TOOLS[nBestToolIndex].dPerformanceIndex then
nBestToolIndex = i
dBestToolResidualDepth = dCurrentResidualDepth
end
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ function MachiningLib.FindChainSaw( Proc, ToolSearchParameters)
-- se entrambi completi
if dBestToolResidualDepth <= 0 and dCurrentResidualDepth <= 0 then
-- scelgo utensile con rapporto lunghezza / diametro minore
if ( TOOLS[i].dLength / pow( TOOLS[i].dDiameter, 1.5)) < ( TOOLS[nBestToolIndex].dLength / pow( TOOLS[nBestToolIndex].dDiameter, 1.5)) then
if TOOLS[i].dPerformanceIndex > TOOLS[nBestToolIndex].dPerformanceIndex then
nBestToolIndex = i
dBestToolResidualDepth = dCurrentResidualDepth
end
@@ -721,6 +721,9 @@ function MachiningLib.PrepareMachiningsForSorting( Part)
for i = 1, #MACHININGS do
local MachiningCurrent = MACHININGS[i].Machining
local ProcCurrent = MACHININGS[i].Proc
if not MachiningCurrent.ptCenter then
MachiningCurrent.ptCenter = Point3d( ProcCurrent.b3Box:getCenter():getX(), 0, 0)
end
-- conversione campo sStage in nStage, numerico e ordinabile
if not MachiningCurrent.sStage or MachiningCurrent.sStage == '' then
@@ -754,9 +757,6 @@ function MachiningLib.PrepareMachiningsForSorting( Part)
-- se fase di lavoro standard, assegnazione dello spezzone
if MachiningCurrent.nStage == 2 then
if not MachiningCurrent.ptCenter then
MachiningCurrent.ptCenter = Point3d( ProcCurrent.b3Box:getCenter():getX(), 0, 0)
end
local nParts = #Part.SplittingPoints + 1
local dPartMinX = Part.b3Part:getMin():getX()
local dPartMaxX = Part.b3Part:getMax():getX()
@@ -823,6 +823,9 @@ local SortingComparisonRules = {
end
end,
-- testa
-- TODO da fare
-- famiglia utensile
function ( MachiningA, MachiningB)
-- TODO tirare fuori da qua??
@@ -832,14 +835,82 @@ local SortingComparisonRules = {
MILL = 3,
MORTISE = 4
}
local nToolFamilyOrderA = ToolFamilyOrder[ TOOLS[ MachiningA.Machining.nToolIndex].sFamily]
local nToolFamilyOrderB = ToolFamilyOrder[ TOOLS[ MachiningB.Machining.nToolIndex].sFamily]
if ToolFamilyOrder[ TOOLS[ MachiningA.Machining.nToolIndex].sFamily] < ToolFamilyOrder[ TOOLS[ MachiningB.Machining.nToolIndex].sFamily] then
if nToolFamilyOrderA < nToolFamilyOrderB then
return 1
elseif ToolFamilyOrder[ TOOLS[ MachiningA.Machining.nToolIndex].sFamily] > ToolFamilyOrder[ TOOLS[ MachiningB.Machining.nToolIndex].sFamily] then
elseif nToolFamilyOrderA > nToolFamilyOrderB then
return -1
else
return 0
end
end,
-- performance utensile
function( MachiningA, MachiningB)
local dToolPerformanceIndexA = TOOLS[MachiningA.Machining.nToolIndex].dPerformanceIndex
local dToolPerformanceIndexB = TOOLS[MachiningB.Machining.nToolIndex].dPerformanceIndex
if dToolPerformanceIndexA > dToolPerformanceIndexB then
return 1
elseif dToolPerformanceIndexA < dToolPerformanceIndexB then
return -1
else
return 0
end
end,
-- probabilmente arrivati qui significa che gli utensili A e B sono gli stessi
-- se così non fosse e tutte le caratteristiche sopra sono uguali, ordine alfabetico
function( MachiningA, MachiningB)
local sToolNameA = TOOLS[MachiningA.Machining.nToolIndex].sName
local sToolNameB = TOOLS[MachiningB.Machining.nToolIndex].sName
if sToolNameA < sToolNameB then
return 1
elseif sToolNameA > sToolNameB then
return -1
else
return 0
end
end,
-- lato di lavoro
-- TODO questo, insieme all'ordinamento X, andranno sostituiti dallo shortest path pesato sulla quantità di rotazione della testa
function( MachiningA, MachiningB)
if MachiningA.Machining.vtToolDirection:getY() < 10 * GEO.EPS_SMALL and MachiningB.Machining.vtToolDirection:getY() >= 10 * GEO.EPS_SMALL then
return 1
elseif MachiningA.Machining.vtToolDirection:getY() >= 10 * GEO.EPS_SMALL and MachiningB.Machining.vtToolDirection:getY() < 10 * GEO.EPS_SMALL then
return -1
else
return 0
end
end,
-- ordinamento X
-- TODO questo andrà sostituito dallo shortest path pesato sulla quantità di rotazione della testa
function( MachiningA, MachiningB)
local bIsMachiningOnFront = MachiningA.Machining.vtToolDirection:getY() < 10 * GEO.EPS_SMALL
local nResult = 0
-- se lavorazione davanti ordine testa->coda
if bIsMachiningOnFront then
if MachiningA.Machining.ptCenter:getX() > MachiningB.Machining.ptCenter:getX() + 10 * GEO.EPS_SMALL then
nResult = 1
elseif MachiningA.Machining.ptCenter:getX() < MachiningB.Machining.ptCenter:getX() - 10 * GEO.EPS_SMALL then
nResult = -1
end
-- se lavorazione dietro ordine coda->testa
else
if MachiningA.Machining.ptCenter:getX() < MachiningB.Machining.ptCenter:getX() - 10 * GEO.EPS_SMALL then
nResult = 1
elseif MachiningA.Machining.ptCenter:getX() > MachiningB.Machining.ptCenter:getX() + 10 * GEO.EPS_SMALL then
nResult = -1
end
end
return nResult
end
}
+1
View File
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ function FACEBYBLADE.Make( Proc, Part, FaceToMachine, EdgeToMachine, OptionalPar
Cutting.nToolIndex = OptionalParameters.nToolIndex
Cutting.Geometry = {{ Proc.id, FaceToMachine}}
Cutting.id = Proc.id
Cutting.vtToolDirection = vtMachiningDirection
-- ===== calcolo LeadIn/out =====
+1
View File
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ function SLOTBYBLADE.Make( Proc, Part, FaceToMachine, EdgeToMachine, OptionalPar
Cutting.dEdgeLength = EdgeToMachine.dLength
Cutting.ptEdge1, _, Cutting.ptEdge2 = EgtSurfTmFacetOppositeSide( Proc.id, FaceToMachine.id, -EdgeToMachine.vtToolDirection, GDB_ID.ROOT)
Cutting.vtEdgeDirection = EdgeToMachine.vtToolDirection ^ FaceToMachine.vtN
Cutting.vtToolDirection = EdgeToMachine.vtToolDirection
local dPocketHeight = 0
if Proc.Topology.sFamily == 'Tunnel' then
+2 -1
View File
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ function SLOTBYCHAINSAW.Make( Proc, Part, FaceToMachine, EdgeToMachine, Optional
Mortising.dEdgeLength = EdgeToMachine.dLength
Mortising.ptEdge1, _, Mortising.ptEdge2 = EgtSurfTmFacetOppositeSide( Proc.id, FaceToMachine.id, -EdgeToMachine.vtToolDirection, GDB_ID.ROOT)
Mortising.vtEdgeDirection = EdgeToMachine.vtToolDirection ^ FaceToMachine.vtN
Mortising.vtToolDirection = EdgeToMachine.vtToolDirection
-- altezza tasca, in base alla topologia
local dPocketHeight = 0
@@ -185,7 +186,7 @@ function SLOTBYCHAINSAW.Make( Proc, Part, FaceToMachine, EdgeToMachine, Optional
-- offset radiale
Mortising.dRadialOffset = 0
-- distanza di sicurezza
Mortising.dStartSafetyLength = max( EdgeToMachine.dElevation, 10)
Mortising.dStartSafetyLength = max( EdgeToMachine.dElevation, ( TOOLS[Mortising.nToolIndex].SetupInfo.dZSafeDelta or 60) + EgtMdbGetGeneralParam( MCH_GP.SAFEZ))
-- overlap
Mortising.dOverlap = 0
-- step
+3 -1
View File
@@ -460,13 +460,15 @@ function STR0002.Make( bAddMachining, Proc, Part, CustomParameters)
-- se ho una sola trimesh, sto lavorando la Proc direttamente e non ho spezzato. Applico direttamente alla geometria calcolata prima
if #vAddId == 1 then
Pocketing.Geometry = {{ Strategy.Machining[j].idProc, Strategy.Machining[j].idFaceToMachine}}
Pocketing.vtToolDirection = Proc.Faces[ Strategy.Machining[j].idFaceToMachine + 1].vtN
bAreAllMachiningsAdded = MachiningLib.AddNewMachining( Proc, Pocketing)
else
-- TODO settare parametro per indicare qual è lo spezzone che deve essere fatto dopo il taglio di separazione
for k = 1, Proc.nFct do
local vtNSplitFace
local nIdTm = EgtIf( Strategy.Machining[j].bMachAppliedToTunnelFace, vAddIdTunnel[i], vAddId[i])
vtNSplitFace = EgtSurfTmFacetNormVersor( nIdTm, k - 1, GDB_ID.ROOT)
Pocketing.ptCenter, vtNSplitFace = EgtSurfTmFacetCenter( nIdTm, k - 1, GDB_ID.ROOT)
Pocketing.vtToolDirection = vtNSplitFace
if vtNSplitFace and AreSameVectorApprox( vtNSplitFace * EgtIf( Pocketing.bToolInvert, -1, 1), Strategy.Machining[j].vtFaceNormal) then
Pocketing.Geometry = {{ nIdTm, k - 1}}
bAreAllMachiningsAdded = bAreAllMachiningsAdded and MachiningLib.AddNewMachining( Proc, Pocketing)